SITE SEARCH:
video overview
ADS

IIr Associates, Inc.
Publisher of The Virginia Engineer

Print-Publishing Services
Web Site Design-Coding-Hosting
Business Consulting

Phone: (804) 779-3527
sales@iirassoc.com
iirassoc.com

FEATURE ARTICLE
Solutions To Effective Oil Spill Remediation Remain Elusive
July 2009


Temple University researcher Michel Boufadel (right) and a student secure a monitoring device along a beach in Alaska's Prince William Sound. Photo courtesy of Michel Boufadel/ Temple University.

It has been two decades since the Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska’s Prince William Sound, spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil and making it one of the largest environmental disasters in history. Twenty years after the accident, its effects are still being felt by the wildlife, on the beaches, and among the residents, long after experts predicted the oil would be cleaned up or dissipate naturally.

Funded by a $1.2 million grant received in 2007 from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, Temple University Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair Michel Boufadel has spent the past two years researching why oil from the Exxon Valdez can still be found along many of the beaches in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. It is the first such study to examine the spill’s impact on the beaches and why oil still lingers.

“In 1994, there was a decision made to stop all remediation efforts on the beaches of Prince William Sound,” said Dr. Boufadel, a hydrologist who is an expert in oil spills and oil remediation. “That decision was based on the rate of oil disappearance during the first four years after the spill.”

Dr. Boufadel said that at that time, the oil was disappearing at a rate of about 70 percent and calculations showed the oil would be gone within the next few years. “The focus since 1994 has been on what is called the injury to the environment, how the herring are affected, how the salmon are affected.”

But five or six years ago, Dr. Boufadel said, there came an awareness that the oil was not disappearing at a critical rate, that it had in fact slipped to a disappearance rate of around four percent a year.

Over the past two summers, Dr. Boufadel and several Temple environmental engineering students have spent 30 days in Alaska, visiting six beaches in the Sound and collecting oil and sediment samples, as well as placing sensors to take year-round water temperature, water salinity and water pressure readings.

“Our goal was to try to understand what factors are causing the oil to persist in certain sediments along these beaches,” he said. “If the oil had only been found in one particular beach, then we would know the oil reached that specific location and remained there. In reality, within the beaches that we examined, you can find oil in one location on the beach, then you move 10-feet to the left or right of that spot and you will not find any oil at all.”

In his Temple lab, Dr. Boufadel has some 50 lbs. of sediment and soil samples from the six beaches that contain toxic material from the Exxon Valdez spill. He has focused his study mainly on the geology and hydrology of these impacted areas as potential reasons why oil from the Exxon Valdez still remains in the beaches of the Sound.


Aerogels, a super-lightweight solid sometimes called "frozen smoke," may capture oil from wastewater and soak up environmental oil spills. Photo courtesy of Wikipedia Commons.

“We think there are hydrologic factors that are preventing the oil from degrading naturally,” he said. “We discovered on one beach that whenever you have fresh water flowing seaward from the area behind the beach you don’t find much oil.”

Dr. Boufadel hopes to issue more definitive conclusions later this spring or early this summer, as well as provide guidelines for locating the oil within the beaches and how to clean it up. As part of his ongoing study, he will be leading another field research visit this coming summer in which he will explore remediation techniques on two of the six beaches.

“As engineers, our goal is not only to understand the factors causing the problem, but also to provide solutions,” said Dr. Boufadel.

A possible solution to oil spill clean-ups that are less publicized may be a newly designed sorbent material. Scientists in Arizona and New Jersey are reporting that aerogels, a super-lightweight solid sometimes called “frozen smoke,” may serve as the ultimate sponge for capturing oil from wastewater and effectively soaking up environmental oil spills. Their study is in ACS’ Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, a bi-weekly journal.

In the new study, Robert Pfeffer and colleagues point out that the environmental challenges of oil contamination go beyond widely publicized maritime oil spills like the Exxon Valdez incident. Experts estimate that each year people dump more than 200 million gallons of used oil into sewers, streams, and backyards, resulting in polluted wastewater that is difficult to treat. Although there are many different sorbent materials for removing used oil, such as activated carbon, they are often costly and inefficient. Hydrophobic silica aerogels are highly porous and absorbent material, and seemed like an excellent oil sponge.

The scientists packed a batch of tiny aerogel beads into a vertical column and exposed them to flowing water containing soybean oil to simulate the filtration process at a wastewater treatment plant. They showed that the aerogel beads absorbed up to 7 times their weight and removed oil from the wastewater at high efficiency, better than many conventional sorbent materials.


  ------   Feature Article Archive  -----  
 
 
The Virginia Engineer MobileOur Mobile site
m.vaeng.com
The Virginia Engineer on facebook
The Virginia Engineer RSS Feed